Last week, for several days running, the government in Romania faced stiff
opposition on the streets to its package of austerity measures. So much
so that the interior minister was forced to resign, while the prime
minister was also called on to resign. So tense was the situation that
the police held emergency talks with the president.
Photo: Surat Lozowick.The
street protests come after the adoption in June of severe cuts in
public spending combined with tax rises. These include public sector
wage cuts of 25 per cent, the cutting of thousands of state jobs and a
5% increase in VAT. Healthcare is also suffering as the government cuts
funding and staffing. All these measures have been adopted under
pressure from the International Monetary Fund and other international
lenders who posed severe conditions in exchange for loans to the
Romanian government.
In one protest an estimated 10,000 workers from several different
sectors demonstrated in front of the main government building in
Bucharest. The demonstrators were demanding the cuts in wages be taken
back and that the minimum wage should be increased. The protest was
organised by the Federation of Trades Unions (BNS).
Earlier in September several hundred self-employed taxi drivers came
out in protest in the capital Bucharest against a government decision
that they should pay health contributions retrospectively for the last
five years. In the southeast county of Vrancea around a 1,000 workers
protested against the government’s decision to cut municipal budgets in
2010 while in eastern Romania in the town of Braila over 100 nurses and
other employees organised a protest outside a hospital.
Meanwhile Cartel Alfa, one of the largest Romanian trade unions as
well as the Union of Police Officers announced they were organising
more protests against wage cuts. It was in fact an unauthorised police
officers’ demonstration against President Traian Basescu that led to
the resignation of the Interior Minister.
In January 2007 Romania became a member of the EU. This was the
final confirmation that western capitalists considered the country a
fully-fledged market economy. Since the fall of the Ceauşescu regime in
1989 the country had adopted a series of measures, with large-scale
privatisation and cuts in state subsidies, geared to transforming
Romania into a capitalist country. Within five years the legal
structures were in place and the country began a process of integration
into world capitalism, and until 2008 foreign investment in the country
had been increasing. That is when the trouble really started. The 2008
global financial crisis seriously affected the economy, pushing it into
recession in 2009.
Before the 2008 crisis hit, all the talk was of Romania being
another “Tiger” economy. In fact prior to 2008 Romania had one of the
highest GDP growth rates in the EU, consistently above +6%, with a high
of +8.4% in 2008. But in 2009 annual GDP fell by more than 7%.
All the calculations that the government had made were based on the
previously high levels of growth. Until then there had been optimistic
talk of Romania doubling its GDP in the period 2006 to 2011. With a
contracting economy the public deficit started to balloon, reaching
over 7% of GDP in 2009.
It was in this situation that the government was forced to turn to
the IMF, the European Commission and the World Bank in early 2009. It
managed to broker a $27 billion financial assistance package, but this
did not come without conditions attached. In exchange for the loan the
government had to impose austerity measures. These included, as we have
already seen a 25% cut in public sector wages and a 15% cut in
pensions. This is what led to the protests in May of this year which
saw up to 40,000 people marching through the streets of Bucharest (in a
country of just over 22 million population). But protests alone are not
going to stop such measures and in June of this year the Romanian
parliament, by a small margin, pushed through the austerity package.
Although the recession has pushed back down what was a growing level
of inflation, this year it still stands at 4.4%, one of the highest
rates of inflation in the EU. So one can imagine the anger of workers
as they see jobs slashed and wages and pensions savagely cut back, and
deteriorating education and healthcare systems. Unemployment has also
gone up, reaching close to 8% this year and is expected to continue to
grow.
So long as the economy was booming, and with the added relief of
emigration to other parts of the EU during the boom of the past decade,
illusions in capitalism among some layers no doubt had increased. This
also explained a reactionary political situation in the country.
“Communism” seemed a thing of the past. This is not difficult to
understand especially when one recalls the monstrous regime that
governed the country under Ceauşescu.
And yet now that people in Romania have had a real taste of
capitalism, not just in boom times, but in times of recession, opinions
are changing. According to an opinion poll carried out by the
“Institute Investigating the Crimes of Communism and the Memory of the
Romanian Exile” – not exactly a Communist-friendly institution almost
half of Romanians today, 49%, believe life was actually better under
Ceauşescu! A higher standard of living and job security were given as
the main arguments to sustain this opinion. Barely a quarter of the
population believes conditions have improved since 1989 [source
balkaninsight.com].
The truth of the matter is that Ceauşescu also cut back heavily on
public spending to pay off his foreign debt. After borrowing heavily in
the 1970s, in the early 1980s he decreed that Romania would eliminate
its foreign debt and by 1989 he had actually paid back $10.5billion
dollars. He did this with draconian measures. Imports were slashed and
food was rationed while the government exported everything it could to
earn cash to pay off the debt. It was this severe programme that led to
the violent overthrow and execution of the Ceauşescus at the end of
1989.
The Ceauşescu regime was a one party totalitarian dictatorship that
rested on state ownership and a planned economy. It is presented as a
“communist” regime, but it had nothing whatsoever to do with genuine
communism. It was what Marxists define a “deformed workers’ state” or a
“proletarian bonapartist” regime. This is a regime that rests on the
economic base of a workers’ state, but which is terribly
bureaucratically deformed, with a privileged elite at the top running
the country. Genuine Communism is the rule of the workers through
democratically elected bodies, with no privileged layer at the top.
In that sense the same poll quoted above reveals another interesting
point. When asked what the negative aspects of the old regime were, 69%
cited the “lack of freedom”. That means that what the Romanian workers
are unconsciously looking to is a system that guarantees jobs, houses,
welfare, pensions, a decent education system, good healthcare, etc.,
and democracy. That can only be achieved through a genuine socialist
transformation of society.
More than twenty years since the fall of so-called “Communism”, with
two decades’ experience of capitalism, the real alternative still
remains a nationalised, planned economy under the democratic control of
the workers who produce all the wealth. This idea will come to haunt
all those ex-Stalinist bureaucrats who after 1989-91 recycled
themselves as bourgeois politicians.
