The recent announcement by Labour that they would re-nationalise the countryโs electricity and gas networks has been met with fierce resistance by the bosses. These fat cats must not receive a penny of compensation.
Labour unveiled new plans last week to bring Britainโs energy networks under public ownership, as a key part of a โGreen Industrial Revolutionโ to tackle climate change.
Measures outlined in the official Labour Party document โ entitled Bringing Energy Home โ include: taking back control of electricity grids and gas pipelines; establishing a National Energy Agency; decarbonising the countryโs energy supplies; installing solar panels on nearly two million homes; and implementing a 20:1 pay ratio within the energy sector.
These are the kind of large-scale changes that are needed if the UK is to begin to seriously tackle the threat of climate change.
But whilst these proposals would โ if implemented โ provide an enormous benefit for the many, the super-rich few at the top have not welcomed Labourโs plans so warmly. In particular, there has been a large backlash from the current private owners and their lobby groups. These parasites are clearly unwilling to give up these assets, despite offers of compensation by Labour.
This should act as a word of warning to the labour movement. Attempts at re-nationalisation by an incoming Corbyn government will be met with huge resistance from big business and their representatives in Parliament. The only way to overcome this opposition is to go on the offensive by mobilising workers and youth around a bold socialist programme.
Big business threats
On the same day as Labour unveiled their latest plans, the private owners of National Grid announced annual profits of ยฃ1.8bn, with higher dividends for shareholders.
No surprise then that National Gridโs chief executive, John Pettigrew, responded to Labourโs nationalisation announcement with threats. Labourโs proposals, the National Grid boss asserted, would โdelay the huge amount of progress and investmentโ in the energy sector, and would not be โin the interests of customersโ.
Pettigrew also warned that attempts to nationalise the grid would face challenges in the courts, if the current owners believed that the compensation offered by the government fell below market value estimates.
โThatโs not what the UK precedent is and thatโs not what international law says,โ chimed Dan Neidle, a partner at law firm Clifford Chance, agreeing that the capitalists must get their pound of flesh.
The Tories, echoing the concerns of the capitalist class, have been quick to state that Labourโs proposals would bankrupt the nation, with the cost of full compensation priced at over ยฃ100 billion.
Labourโs leadership has responded by stating that their plans will be โcost neutralโ, using the nationalisation of Northern Rock in 2008 as a precedent. Under this model, shareholders would be compensated with bonds, with Parliament deciding the exact level of compensation.
But Northern Rock was a bankrupt bank. The Brown Labour government of the time took Northern Rock into public ownership to stave off contagion in the banking sector. As such, the capitalists were happy for this financial burden to be taken off their hands.
By comparison, the bosses and bankers look at the nationalisation of the profitable energy sector โ even with compensation offered โ with horror. So much so that within a day of Labourโs announcement, the markets had chopped over ยฃ1 billion off the stock value of National Grid.
In reality, compensation to these fat cats is like paying a playground bully to hand back your stolen lunch, only for them to steal it again the next day. We must not entertain the idea of any compensation to these gangsters, who have robbed workers of the wealth that they have created for far too long. If anything, these robber barons should be compensating us!
Go on the offensive
This recent episode highlights how a Corbyn government attempting to carry out sweeping economic changes will face a strike of investment from the capitalists. Corbynโs Labour must stand firm in the face of this blackmail.
The only way to combat any potential economic sabotage by the bosses and banks is to go further, and nationalise the banks and major monopolies, as part of a socialist plan of production. Only then can we utilise the resources of society to invest in renewable technologies and build sustainable homes, transport, and energy systems.
The environmental movement has seen an explosive growth in recent months. This has been accompanied by a growth in radical demands. Student strikers internationally, for example, have called for โsystem change, not climate changeโ.
And there is increasing recognition that the labour movement must play a leading role in this fight. This is shown by the calls for a โGreen New Dealโ, and by Labourโs proposals for a โGreen Industrial Revolutionโ. Climate change is a class issue and requires class-based solutions. The question of public ownership is central to the battle against environmental destruction.
To stop climate change, we need urgent, radical action. A Labour government must nationalise the top 150 monopolies โ without compensation โ and implement democratic workersโ control and management.
This idea was embodied within the words of the original Clause 4 of the Labour constitution. This pledged to workers the โfull fruits of their industryโ, on the basis of the โcommon ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchangeโ.
It is high time that we brought this historic socialist clause back, and put these words into action. Only then can we break from the chaos of capitalism and avert a climate catastrophe.